Skip to main content

Posts

Why do all females at ™ belong to Haplogroup HV?

Because ™ intends on attracting Haplogroup HV to pursue ocean colonization by micronations cruising 200+ nautical miles from the coastlines of every country. The following 666 posts read more like a "creation myth" rather than an outline for messianic seasteads on the open ocean. I do this so I can simultaneously pitch such concepts to a diversified collection of media technologies.
Based on a true story, this high fantasy story-line reveals itself to be a psychological thriller grounded in facts; just when you think you're out, ™ will pull you back in. ✲ (our generational leader) will take advantage of tax regulations outside ™’s sovereignty through transnational economic zones. ™ anchors itself to 1 chronicled figure from Haplogroup HV (Kish) more so than anyone else, Šarru-ukīn (Sargon of Akkad). The 1st element in the name is šarru, the Akkadian for "king." The 2nd element is derived from the verb kīnum, related to kūn "to confirm, establish." The n…
Recent posts

Was Titus Flavius (AD 70) a relative of Amalek, grandson of Esau?

Believably, Amalekites are relatives of Amalek, a grandson of Esau. The Talmud says the relative of Esau would eventually become Titus Flavius and his Roman legion, and to a more major extent, all Europeans. This will comfort your understanding of how the New Testament Gospels were written as wartime propaganda by Amalekites related to the Roman imperial court of the Flavian emperors: Vespasian, Titus Flavius, and Domitian. In all probability, their purpose was to control the spread of ™ and moderate its geopolitical virulence.  To seal the deal, the Quran attached itself to Nabataea, as the region was once allied with Hasmoneans against the Seleucids; anyhow, demographics changed and those who usurped the area became our rivals, inviting Pompey's intervention in Israel. The nature of our Edomite sect was mostly unknown before our conversion by the Hasmoneans but I will explain why we worshipped large stones and bricks. Evidently, this high-priesthood was held down by the relative…

Did Renaissance Man tell King Herod (20 BC) he'd rule before he did?

Allegedly, Renaissance Man's goal was to deliver us from Rome. King Herod (40 BC–4 BC), was appointed by Rome. Some sources say Renaissance Man was murdered by Romans during the social revolt that followed Herod's death in 4 BC. Supposedly, "Renaissance Man" in the Mishnah is the same Tzadokite as the 1 recounted with whom Josephus describes with King Herod as ✱. Herod was pleased with Renaissance Man and gave honors upon Tzadokim. Tzadok's perpetual loyalty to each Jebusite king is echoed in Renaissance Man and Herod.  As conflict with Romans intensified, the nations surrounding Judea all sided with the Romans, causing the House of Shammai to stop all commerce and communication between us and them. The House of Hillel was not with it, but when the Sanhedrin went to sort it out, some Zealots entered the House of Shammai.  Allegedly, Tzadok is a descendant from Eleazar; son of Aaron (1 Chron 6). Josephus said Tzadok came to Phinehas, a descendant of Eleazar. A lat…

Can Babylonian captivity be dated to 600 BC?

Theoretically, passages in Isaiah 40-55 (Deutero-Isaiah) were added toward the end of the Babylonian Captivity.




Isaiah 1-39 (Proto-Isaiah) saw our destruction imminent, and our resurrection in the future, “Deutero-Isaiah” speaks of the devastation in the past (42:24-25), and the redemption as coming (42:1-9). Notice the change in attitude from (39:6-7), where our Babylonian Captivity is cast far in the future, to (43:14), where we are spoken of as already in Babylon.

It is natural to identify ⬢ with the ancient idea of an all-extensive realm-soul. It is natural also to regard all Dead Sea books, and the stories of an Exodus, united monarchy, exile and return as fictions regressively composed by a social elite in Yehud during the Persian period or even Romans times, by a Babylonian named Hillel. Either way, one might think the purpose being to legitimize a return to indigenous roots.

Renaissance Man, no doubt, used earlier written and oral traditions, which could only have arisen from…

Was the Phoenician alphabet (1050 BC) generated from a 6-pointed star?

Around 1050 BC, the Phoenician alphabet was used for the writing of our Northern Semitic language. It is the relative of all modern alphabets. The 4-Letter Word was 1st written in Phoenician (12th-Century BC to 150 BC), then Paleo-Hebrew (10th-Century BC to 135 CE), and square (3rd-Century BC to present) scripts. 






Theoretically, we recognized that the urge to make the Phoenician alphabet from 6-pointed stars emerged during moments of intense personal growth. Their appearance indicates a profound re-balancing process was underway in our psyche. The result of the process was a more complex and better-integrated personality.

Reasonably, we were the 1st chronicled language to use an alphabet, derived from the Proto-Canaanite script. In all likelihood, our written word was a necessary component of subjective receptiveness and more abstract forms of thinking. Such anthropomorphic qualities depicted them as speaking to ⬢.

Their shapes are parables to illustrate our theology. Supposedly, 22 …

Then who was pharaoh Akhenaten (1336 BC) to Moses?

I doubt they ever met. It is possible Labaya (King Saul) knew pharaoh Akhenaten of the 18th Dynasty. Ahmose I (1550–1525 BC) is considered to be the pharaoh of the Exodus. A Prince Apepi, named on a seal (now in Berlin) is likely to have been Apophis's son. Apophis also had a daughter, named Herit: she married Amenhotep I, a Theban king. He was a son of Ahmose I During the reign of his grandfather or grandfather, Thebes rebelled against the Hyksos, the rulers of Lower Egypt.
It appears that, when Joshua led ⬢ into the land of Canaan (Joshua 13:33), the Sons of Levi we our only tribe that received cities but were not allowed to be landowners "because the Lord the ⬢ is our inheritance" (Deuteronomy 18:2). This is because before the Levite Moses, we operated in a polytheistic state in which cognitive functions were divided between 1 part of the head which appeared to be "talking," and a 2nd part which "listened."The pharaoh Akhenaten "Effective for …

Was Abraham's unknown pharaoh (1575 BC) King Apepi/Apophis?

I have reason to believe that this unknown Pharaoh was Apophis and he constructed the Great Pyramid of Giza (Mount Sinai) and Great Sphinx (Lion of Judah). Reasonably, Great Sphinx is one of our realm's biggest and most ancient statues, but evidence about when, by whom, and why it was built is unknown.  The 1st sphinxes date to 9,500 BC near Gobekli Tepe, Nevali Çori, and Kortik Tepe- all of which are, presumably, by Noah’s Ark. Great Sphinx relates to Oedipus. Relations between this unknown Pharaoh and Moses’ Birth Legend with other infant birth exposures in ancient literature, including Karna, and Oedipus, are duly noted. This legend of the infant birth exposure motif found in European and Asian folktales- all related to Great Sphinx.  This reflects another expression of Moses in those cultures. Before Moses, we had a consciousness condition of being divided into " 2-chambers". Before Moses, this was our ubiquitous state of the being- it persisted until the near the en…