Skip to main content

Was the Phoenician alphabet (1050 BC) generated from a 6-pointed star?

The post below has no apparent value unless you know how to decipher the text. What you are about to read was knowingly rendered mysterious by mapping this content to an principium that operates on perceivable "words." These words appear as cryptographs in a codebook. The internal structure and length distribution of this 3,000 + word post is doable for fleeting messages. In most cases, 1 or 2 sentences per demanding post.

As  increases our wholeness with others, our empathy will increase, and as our empathy increases ™ desires to act in the best interest of ™.

™’s unfavorable aspects of our empathy towards others, such as when we harm descendants unintentionally. Since a degree of us is essential to the smooth performance of any mob, ™ can take up arms in a political context. The terminal motive for all voluntary action is the devotion to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Another brain territory, the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex/basal forebrain, subsidizes how you learn, chiefly in those with trait empathy. Mirror neurons linked to humans experiencing empathy. The more such neurons fire, the more empathy comes into your life. When you empathize with another, your brain operates as if you are engaged in the actions of the other person. Thus, through empathy, you experience the pleasure of being helped.

EmpathyIn practicing this, you do things in your self interests, even on a neurological scale. There are issues with the early evolution of how ™ operates. A pioneering empathic being would, if genetic, be abused to death by the native non-empathic assassins. This applies despite how far back in evolution the issue is conveyed, not restricted to humans but spanning to pre-reptilians and before.

The cardinal empathic being was manipulated every Chronos another being was in the right place at the right Chronos to capitalize on, so no evolutionary adaptation to managing empathic beings would be demanded the genocide to take effect. It is insurmountable that mutations for empathy, competence to identify it in others, and a guidance of it towards those beings would all occur simultaneously. Skill to identify a non-existent behavior is of no evolutionary value thus cannot pre-evolve.

™ perform actions which are at a cost to ourselves but benefits, either directly or indirectly, 3rd-parties, without anticipation of reciprocity or payment for that work.

Around 1050 BC, the Phoenician alphabet was used for the writing of our Northern Semitic language. It is the relative of all modern alphabets. The 4-Letter Word was 1st written in Phoenician (12th-Century BC to 150 BC), then Paleo-Hebrew (10th-Century BC to 135 CE), and square (3rd-Century BC to present) scripts. 







Phoenician alphabet
Theoretically, we recognized that the urge to make the Phoenician alphabet from 6-pointed stars emerged during moments of intense personal growth. Their appearance indicates a profound re-balancing process was underway in our psyche. The result of the process was a more complex and better-integrated personality.

Reasonably, we were the 1st chronicled language to use an alphabet, derived from the Proto-Canaanite script. In all likelihood, our written word was a necessary component of subjective receptiveness and more abstract forms of thinking. Such anthropomorphic qualities depicted them as speaking to ⬢.

Their shapes are parables to illustrate our theology. Supposedly, 22 demons relate to the 22 letters of the Phoenician alphabet. Amalekites have tended, much like the Sephiroth, to be interpreted as mystical entities, so I merged such ideas derived from demonology in service to ⬢.

Hypothetically, the Phoenician alphabet was a necessary condition for awareness: receptiveness could not have emerged without a written language. The letters' creative power finds its most significant vehicle in Genesis as ⬢ spoke existence into being.

The 1st reference to Israel is in 890 BC and for Judah about 750 BC. Renaissance Man, presumably, suppressed the achievements of Rebbes like Sargon and Apophis and pushed their composites back to our supposed golden age, retaining their identity through our prophet Moses; the cosmic man. In that vein, Moses taught us how to transcend matter, gain immaterial communion, worship through corporeality and fulfill all the theoretical ideals of our Phoenician alphabet.
However, Moses got his break because after the deluge, Abraham was the only 1 among the pious who did not forsake ⬢, and studied in the house of Noah and Shem to learn about "Ways of ⬢," and continuing the line of High Priest from Noah and Shem, then he descended the office to Levi and his seeds forever.

These Mosaic seeds come from diverse Levitic backgrounds, having in all 21 differing Y-chromosome haplogroups: notwithstanding, E-M78 and E-M123 are far more pronounced in this priestly class. Through us, ⬢'s mention shall be exalted forever and ever.

NOTE: Canaanite culture, apparently, developed in situ from Ham. The Phoenician alphabet itself evolved from the Circum-Israeli Nomadic Pastoral Complex, which in turn originated from Shem and his fusion of ancestral proto-Natufian farming cultures which led to Japheth setting off the Neolithic Revolution in the Levant.
Did Sea Peoples (Sicilian military contractors) guard the King Solomon?

Excavations uncovered structures that date from his reign. In any event, the 1st temple should not be considered an act of particular devotion to ⬢ because Solomon is also described as building places of worship for many other deities. Solomon's apparent initial devotion to ⬢, illustrated in (1 Kings 8:14–66), were, evidently, written much later, after Jerusalem had become the center of the kingdom; replacing locations such as Shiloh and Bethel.
In all probability, Tzadok was native Jebusite who displaced David’s son Adonijah, in favor of his fellow Jerusalemite's son Solomon (1 Kings 2:27, 35, 39), thus highjacking the throne for Jebusite Bathsheba to maintain indigenous roots.

With the comfort of the Phoenician alphabet, King Solomon re-opened the trade routes in the Eastern Mediterranean that related the Hyksos and Mesopotamia's civilizations after the long hiatus of the Bronze Age collapse resurrected, beginning the "Orientalising" trend and later seen in Hellenistic art.
As a synonym for "Asiatic," Hyksos played a role in ancient literature down to Hellenistic times. Plausibly, together we invented a more democratic and flatter oligarchic social structure than anyone before the Athenians, we were the inspiration to Hellenistic constitutional government. Perhaps this is why there’s notable relations between Rabbinic rules of interpreting Halakha and the hermeneutics of Hellenistic law.
Again, the Sea Peoples most likely originated from Sicily. The Etruscan language has variants and representatives in Aegean inscriptions. They sailed around the eastern Mediterranean and invaded Anatolia, Syria, Canaan, Cyprus, and Egypt toward the end of the Bronze Age. These Proto-Greco-Romans would later freely admit to the influence of our Phoenician alphabet.

This fusion can be traced to the green-eyed red-headed Iberian Celtic realms of the 8th-Century BC Levant. The earliest records of caravan voyages from Tayma and Sheba unto the Middle-Euphrates occurred in the mid-8th-Century BC, placing a visit from the Queen of Sheba around this time.

King Menahem (2 Kings 15:17), or Pul, reigned over Israel in the mid-8th-Century BC; when Assyrians (Hosea 7:11) 1st enter Israel.  For independence, he paid tribute. After he died, (from old age)  his son Pekahiah took over. Pekah (a captain of Pekahiah's army) killed Pekahiah and refused to pay, the destruction of the 1st temple and our deportation soon followed.

Dead Sea Scrolls include 8th-Century BC manuscripts from additional Judaean Desert sites confirming this. Dead Sea Scrolls were a significant discovery that demonstrated the unprecedented (not perfect) accuracy of the Masoretes over a thousand-year period. 
To all appearances, Solomon temple was an acropolis. Believably, he ruled more than Jerusalem. A lack of physical evidence is not unexpected because the city was pulverized by the Babylonians, then rebuilt and destroyed several times.

Renaissance Man (ben Ammiel and ben David) was, purportedly, a mysterious figure born on the day the 1st temple is destroyed. A wind carried Renaissance Man to the city of Nineveh "mighty Rome" where he remains waiting for end times. Renaissance Man, apparently, can now be found at the “house of filth” near the archetypal corner store where he's posted up. Supposedly, Renaissance Man has a despicable, broken down image- he's in discomfort. In all probability, his appearance is an illusion.
Is Renaissance Man's influence clear in the narrative of King Josiah?

In all likelihood, Exodus 20-23 and 34 formed our starting point. Deuteronomy 5 reflects King Josiah's attempt to relate to the older Mosaic tradition. This reconstruction assumes Renaissance Man's perspective in that Judaism evolves from the more ritualistic to the more pious. The 10 Commandments revealed to Moses emphasized rituals, and the "pious" King Josiah composed elements at a later date, when Renaissance Man had begun talking about ✱ to his community in Qumran.

Theoretically, Deuteronomy was initially just the law cipher and covenant, written to cement the reforms of Renaissance Man through his phantom reflection of King Josiah, and later expanded to stand as the introduction to the full chronicle. The Dead Sea Scrolls explain how Deuteronomy was then detached from it and included with Genesis-Exodus-Leviticus-Numbers because it already had Moses as its central character.

The death of Moses was initially the ending of Numbers and was merely moved from there to the end of Deuteronomy. The use of the personifications within our Dead Sea Scrolls particularly pertains to issues associated with death anxiety; the root of our psychic conflict.

⬢ was initially the political demigod of the Israel and Judah. As time progressed, the henotheistic cult of ⬢ grew increasingly militant in its opposition to the worship of other demigods. Later, the reforms of Renaissance Man, here related to as Josiah, imposed a form of strict monotheism. For example, Solomon builds temples to many demigods, and King Josiah allegedly destroyed the statues of Asherah in the Solomon's temple (2 Kings 23:14).

Mind you, Josiah's grandfather Manasseh had erected 1 such statue (2 Kings 21:7). Asherah poles, which were sacred trees mentioned many times by Renaissance Man. They were prohibited by the Deuteronomic cipher which commanded: "You shall not plant any tree as an Asherah beside the altar of ⬢."

You can't look at apparent contradictions as meer liturgic error- everything written by Renaissance Man had multiple layers of intent. For example, Isaiah and Jeremiah predicted the return of our exiles taken by the Assyrians in 722 BC- but It never happened. Following their conquest, the other 10 tribes assimilated with others forming all major world sects. The Kingdom of Judah returned from Babylonian Captivity in 537 BC, the 10 tribes of Israel never had permission to rebuild their homeland. Assyria has long since vanished in 612 BC. But why? Let's proceed...

Does ⬢ want us to acknowledge Amalek before we go?

Hypothetically, acknowledgment of Amalek must be a continuous process throughout your life; and even after the focus of such individuation has moved on to ⬢, the later stages of Amalek’s integration will continue to take place.

Allegedly, devekut relates to the 613 mitzvot. Violation of the mitzvot is a sin "transgression." There are 3 levels of sin: Pesha, an "intentional sin"; in deliberate defiance of ⬢'s commandments is at the top. Although courts executing sinners no longer prescribe penalties, of the 613 mitzvot, 3 relate to revenge on Amalek: namely to destroy his relatives utterly.

Rabbinists derived these from Deuteronomy 25:17–18, Exodus 17:14 and 1 Samuel 15:3. However, this commandment is not practiced by us today, based on the argument that Sargon II’s son, Sennacherib (705 BC to 681 BC), mixed the nations, so it is impossible to determine who is an Amalekite. Nonetheless, the command to kill all the women, children, and the notion of united punishment is something we have to confront immediately.

Assimilation of Amalek gives you body, so to speak, and provides thereby a launching-pad for further individuation. Renaissance Man who made many additions and interpretations of Halakha, did so only by regulations from Moses at Sinai (Deuteronomy 17:11).

Supposedly, "Sinai" and "Horeb" are the same place. Horeb means "glowing/heat", the sun, while Sinai derives from the name Sin (Sumerian Nanna), a moon deity, and thus Sinai and Horeb are the mountains of the moon and sun. On boundary stones and cylinder seals, the 8-pointed star is shown alongside the crescent moon, which was the symbol of Sin and the rayed solar disk, which was a symbol of Shamash (Sumerian Utu).

In Babylon, we worked in Ishtar's temples, apparently, branded with the seal of the 8-pointed star. Inanna-Ishtar's most common symbol was the 8-pointed star, though the exact number of points sometimes often equaled 6. The integration of Amalek, or the realization of the personal unaware, marks the 1st stage of this analytic process I speak of.

Is Asherah the Inanna-Ishtar-Astarte-Aphrodite-etc Queen of Heaven? Inanna-Ishtar is alluded to as the Phoenician demigoddess Asherah or Astarte, who later changed the development of the Hellenistic demigoddess Aphrodite.

The archaeological remains of Asherah show Canaanite culture continued unabated. In truth, pure monotheism didn't "stick" until Roman times. ⬢ was in competition with many other cults, described by the swarm of Asherah type sects. The oldest books of the Dead Sea Scrolls reflect this competition, as in the writings of Hosea and Nahum, whose authors lament our "apostasy", threatening us with the wrath of ⬢ if we do not give up our polytheistic cults of old.

The issue, most likely, was Asherah cults avoided the questioning of evil by endowing their demigods with the same flaws and jealousies that discomforted us to the point where you’d think they were actually humans. That had it right in the sense that no demigod was fundamentally good or evil; withal their demigods could exercise the same free will that humankind possesses and our broken loyalty toward them would reflect that.

Most of us believed our free sufficiently explained the existence of "evil" while maintaining that ⬢'s presence remains logically possible. This gets discredited by the presence of non-human related "evil" such as droughts, tsunamis, and malaria; thus, human sacrifice was a normal coping mechanism for polytheists.

⬢, even in pre-exilic ™, was the creator of both good (Yetzer HaTov) and evil (Yetzer HaRa), like stated in Isaiah 45:7: "I create the light, I create the darkness." Deuteronomy 6:4, alternatively translated from the Phoenician alphabet as "The LORD is ⬢, the LORD alone" says it all. Beyond the individual head, their whole of mythology could be taken as a sort of projection of ⬢".

Therefore, you could learn about ⬢ by studying Asherah sects, as well as belief systems like astrology. However, unless you understand they are all fractal patterns of the personifications within our Dead Sea Scrolls- then you will become lost in your own head.

Despite Asherah’s association with ⬢ in extra-Qumranic sources, Deuteronomy 12 has ⬢ commanding the removal of her shrines. Until our exile in 586 BC, polytheism was normal throughout Israel; it was only after the exile that worship of ⬢ alone became established, and at the time of the Hasideans that monotheism became universal. That said, events like our Babylonian Captivity and Roman persecution brought us closer to ⬢.Theoretically, passages in Isaiah 40-55 (Deutero-Isaiah) were added toward the end of the Babylonian Captivity.





Babylonian captivity

Isaiah 1-39 (Proto-Isaiah) saw our destruction imminent, and our resurrection in the future, “Deutero-Isaiah” speaks of the devastation in the past (42:24-25), and the redemption as coming (42:1-9). Notice the change in attitude from (39:6-7), where our Babylonian Captivity is cast far in the future, to (43:14), where we are spoken of as already in Babylon.



It is natural to identify ⬢ with the ancient idea of an all-extensive realm-soul. It is natural also to regard all Dead Sea books, and the stories of an Exodus, united monarchy, exile and return as fictions regressively composed by a social elite in Yehud during the Persian period or even Romans times, by a Babylonian named Hillel. Either way, one might think the purpose being to legitimize a return to indigenous roots.



Renaissance Man, no doubt, used earlier written and oral traditions, which could only have arisen from separate swarms within ancient Israel, but there is no proof that it was completed under Achaemenid rule (400 BC). For example, Halakha "our laws" has been developed throughout the generations since Babylonian Captivity, continually expanding until it spirals inward as the Talmud.



✱ were not exclusively Jews, as our Torah relates Cyrus the Great, king of Persia, as ✱ for his decree to rebuild our Temple. ✱ is often seen as "King Tzadik." Isaiah's prophecy wasn’t about Cyrus the Great. Renaissance Man was the “tortured servant” of Isaiah 52–53, one despised; discomforted by our enduring evil.



Of the 166 words in Isaiah 53 (of the Dead Sea Scrolls), there are only 3 letters in question within the Masoretic text. They comprise the word "light," in verse 11. The 2nd Temple was constructed under Zerubbabel. During the period of the 2nd Temple, Mosaic Law was recited daily, before the reading of the Shema; they seem to be the only real important part of our services back then.



The Silver Scrolls were found in Jerusalem, written in Paleo-Hebrew; dated around Babylonian captivity - 586 BC. They’re essentially amulets with the Priestly comfort blessing recorded in Numbers. It provides the 1st known citations of “the Bible” and the 1st confessional statement concerning ⬢ as the "Rebuker of Evil".



This does not mean Numbers already existed, some content in the 5 Books of Moses (Pentateuch) existed in the 1st Temple period and the suggestion that either provide proof that they existed is an overinterpretation of the evidence. The 1st 5 books of Moses were translated into Greek at roughly the same time the Dead Sea Scrolls carbon date to (33 plus or minus 200 years). Significant linguistic analysis dates fragments from 225 BC to 50. Other radiocarbon dates estimate between 385 BC to 82 with a 68% accuracy rate.



The Book of Queen Esther is not in the Dead Sea Scrolls.



As reported by Masoretes, Queen Esther was married king Ahasuerus, Xerxes I during the time of the Persian Achaemenid Empire, although Josephus said he was Xerxes' son Artaxerxes.

The Book of Esther is not in the Dead Sea Scrolls because her marriage to a Persian was looked down upon; thus the Purim festival is not included our Qumran calendar.



Moreover, the Book of Esther, does not mention ⬢ whatsoever. Masoretes sculpted Queen Esther as an archetype of exile and empowerment that shaped the discourse of marginalized peoples. She basically persuaded those who have power over her. With chaos in Judea, Xerxes' successor, Artaxerxes, presented Ezra (480–440 BC) to resurrect order. This is why we are most pronounced in Ezra and his offspring, namely through the kids of High-Priest Joshua.



Allegedly, Esther revealed her identity, pointing to Haman as the evil (Yetzer HaRa) plotting to destroy them. During the Purim festival, her book is read in the commemoration for saving us from Haman (an Amalekite) plots genocide. The Masoretic text exerts overwhelming influence on the heads of individuals. These effects of course vary widely, since they involve virtually every emotion and situation.



At times, their coded content can terrify, but they can also heal. When you think about it, Queen Esther should not have taken Vashti's place. It also seems like she refrained from saving us until her own life was threatened, in fact- she carries out bloodthirsty vengeance like the rest of us when pushed to our limits.



Esther, presumably, understood the netherrealm was suffused with transcendent sparks, concealed within "husks". These sparks have to be resurrected and elevated to their proper place in the cosmos. Materiality itself could be embraced and consecrated. Queen Esther intended to develop equanimity toward all matters material, not ignoring them, but understanding their superficiality.



To understand how our personifications within our Dead Sea Scrolls perpetuate themselves in Masoretic content let’s look into the sects that have attached themselves to them. Although the New Testament and Quran mention them directly by name, I am referring to their cryptic archetypal motifs. ™ is a theological system that shares similarities and yet is distinct from and any dispensationalist theology that sees all Old Covenant laws as "canceled" for Jewish people.  ™ is in favor of the New Testament for Christians and the Quran for Muslims.



Both sequels to the Old Testament revolve around a Nazarean "Nazarene" of the Ossaeans who originally came to the Dead Sea from Nabataea- Renaissance Man. He concluded with absolute trust that our bible will not be exchanged and that there will never be any other Torah from ⬢, hallowed be His Name.



Let’s rewind: around the time of Queen Esther, after Babylonian captivity opened a minor power vacuum in Judah (before our return under Cyrus (559-530 BC). As Edomites moved into our open grazing lands, Nabataean inscriptions began to appear in Edomite territory. An estimated 0.2% of the Dead Sea Scrolls is in Nabataean script. Relations between late Nabataean Arabic dialect and the 1s found in Akkad way after Sargon- during the Neo-Assyrian period; "Nabatu" confirm they were 1 of several Arab tribes in the region.



Was the Teacher of Righteousness (Moreh Zedek) a Hasidean?



Tzadok means "Righteous." It is clear the founder of the Hasideans produced the scrolls, the Teacher of Righteousness (named messiah Judah).  However, the name Judah here in the scrolls is based on connotations to the House of Judah and a phrase from Isaiah written during Babylonian captivity.



Even on the surface, "Judah" was awaiting the arrival of a messiah before he died a violent death in 72 BC. The Teacher of Righteousness allegory was that of a perpetual harbinger than a one-time fulfillment from my perspective. It appears as though Renaissance Man went by ben Judah during the War.



On the Feast of Tabernacles, Jonathan “false priest” displaced the Teacher of Righteousness, later founder of the Hasideans (Proto-Hasidic masters). This is possibly why Hasideans are associated with Feast of Tabernacles (Suk. v. 4). A related character, which came after Johanan yet is mentioned by Renaissance Man is Jonathan Apphus. He was the leader of the Hasmonean dynasty of Judea from 161 to 143 BC (1 Maccabees. 5).



Psalm 149:6 agrees with 2 Maccabees, as reported by which the Hasideans under Judas Maccabeus "continually stirred up war and rebellion, and would not let the country be at comfort." 2 Maccabees was written in Koine Greek (1 Maccabees, wasn't). 2 Maccabees revised chronicled developments, adding prayers for the death and resurrection on Judgment Day.



The Teacher of Righteousness spoke about 2 messiahs in the future. He said that "he would be vindicated in the end," by Mashiach ben David and ben Joseph. In general, the unqualified relates to Renaissance Man aka Mashiach ben David (son of David). Sometimes, the name Renaissance Man son of Ammiel son of Joseph is omitted, and the text directly relates to the son of David. These “jedi mind tricks” were designed to stimulate messianic tendencies amongst its readers not specify a person in particular.



In all probability, Hasideans were the reason we were victorious after Babylonian captivity and during our rebellion, lasting from 167 to 160 BC, against the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire, with the comfort of Judas Maccabeus, resulting in the installation of Hanukkah. The 6-pointed star remains associated with the number 7 and thus with the Hanukkah menorah. After the Maccabean revolt, Hasideans were done with Judas Maccabeus; re-establishing themselves as the Essenes. This is also supported by the relation between Ἐσσαῖοι  "pious" and "Ḥasidim" "pious".



The high-priesthood was held down by the relatives of Tzadok during most of the 2nd Temple period, down to the time of Simon the Just. Simon's 1st born, Onias III, and his 2nd son Jehoshua Hellenized us until the Maccabean Revolt. Onias is said to have founded our swarm in Qumran but I beg to differ. Teacher of Righteousness was the leader of the Sicarii, suicidal assassins. His father was Judas of Galilee and (son of Hezekiah). Some think this pre-Pauline Teacher was James, brother of Jesus. If that’s the case, ⬢ resurrected as Jesus to convert Gentiles to Noahide law for us to maintain Mosaic law in harmony with ✱.



How does John Hyrcanus and his son, Alexander Jannaeus, tie it all together?



Coins found at the same sites form John Hyrcanus and continuing until 73, support the dating of the Qumran Caves Scrolls to the time of Menahem. To all appearances, Romans took Renaissance Man’s bait and amalgamated several Mosaic figures into one- Jesus, proving to gentiles that humans will always act in our own self-interest and true tzedakah is impossible without ⬢.



Based on the gospels, their Jesus had a Sadducean carefree approach to keeping to our laws and attempts to convert others. Sadducees drew their name from Tzadok (the Mishnaic Tzadoki).

When you give Tzedakah, by definition, it reduces your fitness at some capacity: however non-reproductive Tzadokim, like our swarm in Qumran, already had a fitness of zero- sacrificing themselves for the united.



The replacement theology of our Babylonian captivity stems from cosmological natural selection. In short, when a hive has a virgin ready to go and a queen ready to leave. Like each primordial micro-black hole, she continues proliferating until she dies a natural death; when the former virgin, now mated, will take her place (conceive of a new universe).



Concerning replacement theology, let’s take Yeshu the Pharisee. Number 1 Yeshu is not short for Yeshua, but rather "a person to be blotted out" created by taking the 1st letter of the words. Number 2 he was among the exiled returning from persecution by John Hyrcanus in 74 BC. Yeshu the Pharisee studied under nasi Joshua ben Perachiah.



In Sanhedrin 107b and Sotah 47a, this Yeshu was sent away for misinterpreting a word that in context should have been understood during a period of refuge in Egypt for those of us fleeing Jannaeus. It also mentioned in the Jerusalem Talmud in Chagigah 2:2. After several returns for forgiveness Yeshu the Pharisee mistook Perachiah's signal to wait as a final rejection, and so Yeshu the Pharisee started "worshipping a brick" like Edomites.



The story ends by invoking a Mishnaic era teaching that Yeshu the Pharisee practiced black magic, deceived and led us astray. Allegedly, the origins of the Masoretic text goes back to the times of John Hyrcanus and Alexander Jannaeus.



In opposition to the Pharisees, they started their own cult. Supposedly, one side of Renaissance Man’s family members were forcefully converted to Kabbalism, apparently by Jannaeus. It was Jannaeus who occupied our towns of Moab and Gilead.



Nabataea's alphabet itself also developed out of our Babylonian captivity. The Aramaic alphabet used by John Hyrcanus, although it used a distinctive cursive script from which the Arabic alphabet emerged. This Jewish origin of the Arabic text will universally accepted by the time I stop posting. E-M215 and E-M35 house the vast majority of Afroasiatic speakers-the oldest relative of Hebrew.